I started reading Hugh's commentary on a Los Angeles Times article on North Korea today. I canceled my subscription to the LAT long ago for its clear and consistent editorialism in its non-editorial pages. I told myself, I would not let Hugh work me up on this one, because such is the Los Angeles Times.
However, his post was passionate and he was focused on the issue, so I thought I would read the "offending" article. It is maddening and extremely one sided. I am shocked, even by my extremely low opinion of the Los Angeles Times, that they would print such a clearly North Korean propaganda piece.
So, let's fisk the article (LAT in blue):
"He arrived at the entrance to a North Korean government-owned restaurant and karaoke club here in the Chinese capital with a handshake and a request. "Call me Mr. Anonymous," he said in English.
This North Korean, an affable man in his late 50s who spent much of his career as a diplomat in Europe, has been assigned to help his communist country attract foreign investment. With the U.S. and other countries complaining about North Korea's nuclear weapons program and its human rights record, it's a difficult task, he admitted."
So the Barbara Demick, the LAT reporter is talking to a North Korean diplomat, that enjoys the luxuries of living away from his own country's oppressive regime trying to "raise money" (unless of course he is looking to sell arms or trade technology), in a North Korean owned club in China.
"'There's never been a positive article about North Korea, not one,' he said. 'We're portrayed as monsters, inhuman, Dracula … with horns on our heads.'"
I am glad to see Mr. Anonymous now has a friend and a positive article in the Los Angeles Times. He can't use this line in anymore with reporters.
"So, in an effort to clear up misunderstandings, he expounded on the North Korean view of the world in an informal conversation that began one night this week over beer as North Korean waitresses sang Celine Dion in the karaoke restaurant, and resumed the next day over coffee.
The North Korean, dressed in a cranberry-colored flannel shirt and corduroy trousers, described himself as a businessman with close ties to the government. He said he did not want to be quoted by name because his perspective was personal, not official. Because North Koreans seldom talk to U.S. media organizations, his comments offered rare insight into the view from the other side of the geopolitical divide."
Well at least the North Koreans and us can agree we like Canadian singers. That is a start for diplomacy isn't it? More that unites our two governments than divides us. I also love the imagery of the cranberry-colored flannel shirt with cords. It brings to mind this image. Very strong, masculine image of a down to earth former diplomat. (To listen to the Monty Python Lumberjack song click here)
This is the business man described with "close ties" to the government of North Korea. The talking points fed to the Los Angeles Times continue.
"He said better relations with the United States were key to turning around his nation's economy, which has nearly ground to a halt over the last decade amid famine, the collapse of industry and severe electricity shortages. "For basic life, we can live without America, but we can live better with" it, he said."
The North Korean government subjects its people and especially children to starvation. Over two-thirds of North Korean children are malnourished. According to Disaster Relief, a partnership of the Red Cross, CNN Interactive and IBM, "To survive the months ahead, millions of famished North Koreans will eat wild plants, tree bark, and noodles and cakes made of indigestible grasses and cornstalks."
The Lumberjack continues to be quoted:
"Yet he voiced strong enthusiasm for his country's recent announcement that it had developed nuclear weapons. The declaration, which jarred U.S. officials, was not intended as a threat, he said, but merely a way to advance negotiations.
'Now that we are members of the nuclear club, we can start talking on an equal footing. In the past, the U.S. tried to whip us, as though they were saying, 'Little boy, don't play with dangerous things.'
A colleague, a 55-year-old man also visiting from North Korea, nodded.
'This was the right thing to do, to declare ourselves a nuclear power. The U.S. had been talking not only about economic sanctions, but regime change,' the businessman said. 'We can't just sit there waiting for them to do something. We have the right to protect ourselves.'"
How much did the North Koreans spend on a nuclear weapons program that they shared with countries that support terrorism such as Libya? Nowhere does the Los Angeles Times point out that North Korea has 1.2 million soldiers, the world's 4th largest army, or that it spends 20%-25% of its GDP on military spending. Does the Los Angeles Times wonder why the North Korean economy is in the tank with defense spending 5 times that of the United States on a percentage of GDP basis?
"'The North Koreans said they were keenly attentive to the language used by Bush administration officials in regard to their country. They were relieved that in this year's State of the Union address the president didn't again characterize North Korea as part of an "axis of evil," as he did in 2002. But they were greatly offended that Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice called North Korea an "outpost of tyranny" during her confirmation hearings.
"We were hoping for change from the U.S. administration. We expected some clear-cut positive change," the North Korean said. "Instead, Condoleezza Rice immediately committed the mistake of calling us an outpost of tyranny. North Koreans are most sensitive when they hear that kind of remark.'"
Condi's tough talk upsets the North Koreans. A country that has its children eating bark off of trees that spends 25% of its GDP on defense is an "outpost of tyranny". "We were hoping for change from the U.S." is code for "we were hoping for John Kerry" (whom they supported during the campaign).
"He believes that Americans have the wrongheaded notion that North Koreas are unhappy with the system of government under Kim Jong Il. "We Asians are traditional people," he said. 'We prefer to have a benevolent father leader.'"
Kim Jong il is no benevolent father leader. He is a leader who starves his people, works to build nuclear weapons, fires missiles over his neighbors like Japan, exports drugs for cash and speaks of leveling Los Angeles with a nuke.
"He also said that U.S. criticism of North Korea's record on human rights was unfair and hypocritical. In its annual human rights report on Monday, the State Department characterized North Korea's behavior as 'extremely poor.' It said 150,000 to 200,000 people were being held in detention camps for political reasons and that there continued to be reports of extrajudicial killings.
'Is there any country where there is a 100% guarantee of human rights? Certainly not the United States,' the businessman said. 'There is a question of what is a political prisoner. Maybe these people are not political prisoners but social agitators.'"
The only reminder to the LAT reader of North Korea's problems comes in this paragraph about human rights, but quickly gives the North Korea response that the US isn't perfect, therefore don't complain about people dying in political camps and starving.
"While Westerners tend to stress the rights of the individual, he said, "we have chosen collective human rights as a nation…. We should have food, shelter, security rather than chaos and vandalism. The question of our survival as a nation is dangling."
The North Korean admitted that "it is no secret that we have economic problems," and he said North Koreans were themselves largely to blame because they let their industry become too dependent on the socialist bloc countries. After the Soviet Union collapsed in 1991, trade fell sharply.
But he faulted the United States for the collapse of a 1994 pact under which North Korea was supposed to get energy assistance in return for freezing its nuclear program. The agreement fell apart after Washington accused North Korea in 2002 of cheating on the deal, and the U.S. and its allies suspended deliveries of fuel oil."
The North Koreans cannot even provide their own description of "collective human rights". This whole concept is a joke and a communist response to all human rights abuses. The 1994 agreement, as symbolized with this picture
The article continues. You can read it. There really is no point, unless you are hungry for "news" straight from Pyongang.