I had assumed that China was moving more aggressively on the diplomatic front into the Americas as it transitions from a regional to international power. Additionally, it would be in China's interest to be able to influence governments near the United States, much as the US has done with neighbors of China.
I had looked for information regarding this for a prior post but had not been able to find good proof. Thanks to RealClearPolitics carrying an article by Frederick Stakelbeck, I have found one entitled "China's Foray into Latin America".
"Recognizing an opportunity for a permanent base of influence and operations in the Western Hemisphere, China has stepped into the void caused by the Soviet collapse to embrace Castro...
The bilateral relationship has grown in both its diversity and intensity recently, heightened by Cuba and China’s mutual disdain for what they see as America’s global hegemony and intrusiveness. Their joint, anti-democracy stance was further solidified in March when Cuba’s Foreign Ministry Office issued a statement supporting the “one China” principle and the Chinese anti-secession law.
Recent diplomatic overtures and a renewed commitment to the Castro government make it clear that China views Cuba as a valuable ally moving forward. In November 2004, Chinese President Hu Jintao and 200 Chinese businesspersons took part in the China Investment and Trade Forum in Havana. As a result of this increased economic cooperation, China has become the island’s third largest trading partner behind only Venezuela and Spain. This, as Chinese President Hu Jintao reaffirmed his country’s commitment to Latin America by announcing an astounding $100 billion investment in the region in the next decade.
But China’s primary interest in Cuba is not related to commerce. Rather, the country is interested in fostering defense ties with the island and developing a state-of-the-art intelligence infrastructure to monitor US activities in the region. Intelligence and spying, not Cuban cigars and sugar cane, motivates Beijing."
Through its growing economic muscle, China looks to build an intelligence and defense network in Cuba and throughout Latin America as future leverage against the United States. I highly commend the whole article to you. We are seeing the opening chess moves on both sides of the Pacific for future rival superpower control and influence around the world between China and the United States.
While they are typically leftist extremists, the Democratic Underground made a good point. America is unilaterally reducing its ties to some countries over their support of the ICC.
What are your thoughts on this angle?
Posted by: Dan | April 09, 2005 at 04:50 PM
I followed the link, but do not know the current status of US relations on a military level with South American countries.
I do believe that because of the US superpower status that foreign nations will attempt to use the ICC to constrict US involvement. When a country like Germany can have a case go through their court system that has a goal of trying Sec. Def. Donald Rumsfeld for "war crimes" does not add to my confidence level of what international law and criminal courts will wreck on US service members.
I think the Bush Administration is right to be leary of the ICC. The US picks up the bill, sends its soldiers to possibly die for others freedom, and at the end of the day, nations that have a bone to pick with the US will politicize the ICC against us.
That is my overall thought on why the State Department and Defense Department are not happy with any support of the ICC.
Kind regards,
Bill
Dawn's Early Light
Posted by: Bill | April 10, 2005 at 10:03 PM
I agree with your skepticism of the ICC. Much of the effort seems intent on entangling US troops for missions the international community demands. Hypocracy.
Nonetheless, the ICC could be a useful tool for us in rounding up the Mugabes and Taylors (and their goons) of the world.
Hopefully we can find a middle ground, that protects American soldiers, convicts the goons, and maintains our ties to Latin America.
Posted by: Dan | April 11, 2005 at 06:33 AM